1trannytube.com DNS Report

Health Score: 69%

Need help fixing DNS ? Get an expert advise at support forum

Checked: 2 months before

Parent

NS records at parent servers

ns1.az7t5.com [ 194.187.96.142 ]
ns2.az7t5.com [ 194.187.96.144 ]
[These were obtained from a.gtld-servers.net.]

Glue at parent nameservers 7/7

SUCCESS Parent nameservers know A records for your domain, Very good !

NS

Mismatched glue 0/7

The glue provided by the root servers does not match glue that provided by your authoritative DNS servers.
(ns1.az7t5.com.		172800	IN	A	194.187.96.142) present at Parent, missing at (194.187.96.142, 194.187.96.144)
(ns2.az7t5.com.		172800	IN	A	194.187.96.144) present at Parent, missing at (194.187.96.142, 194.187.96.144)
(ns1.1trannytube.com.	30	IN	A	194.187.96.142) present at (194.187.96.142, 194.187.96.144), missing at Parent
(ns2.1trannytube.com.	30	IN	A	194.187.96.144) present at (194.187.96.142, 194.187.96.144), missing at Parent

Nameservers A records 7/7

SUCCESS Nameservers do include corresponding A records when asked for your NS records. This ensures that your DNS servers know the A records corresponding to all your NS records.

Nameservers report identical NS records 7/7

SUCCESS The NS records at all your nameservers are identical.

Nameservers respond 10/10

SUCCESS All of your nameservers listed at the parent nameservers responded.

Nameserver name validity 7/7

SUCCESS All of the NS records that your nameservers report are valid (no IPs or partial domain names).

Number of nameservers 2/5

WARNING You have 2 nameservers. You must have at least 2 nameservers (RFC2182 section 5 recommends at least 3 nameservers), and preferably no more than 7.

Lame nameservers 7/7

SUCCESS All the nameservers listed at the parent servers answer authoritatively for your domain.

Missing (stealth) nameservers 0/7

DANGER There are nameservers not listed at the parent servers:
ns2.1trannytube.com.
ns1.1trannytube.com.

Root missing nameservers 0/7

DANGER There are nameservers not listed at your nameservers:
ns1.az7t5.com.
ns2.az7t5.com.

Nameservers on separate class C's 7/7

SUCCESS Nameservers are in a different networks.

public IPs 7/7

SUCCESS All of your NS records appear to use public IPs.

SOA

SOA record

SOA record is:
Hostmaster email
hostmaster.webazilla.com
Serial
1101310
Refresh
60
Retry
30
Expire
604800
TTL
30

Serial agreement 7/7

SUCCESS All your nameservers agree that your SOA serial number is 1101310 That means that all your nameservers are using the same data.

SOA MNAME 0/3

DANGER SOA (Start of Authority) record states that your master (primary) name server is: ns1.webazilla.com, but that server is not listed at the parent servers.

Serial value 0/1

WARNING SOA serial number is: 1101310 This not appears to be in the recommended format of YYYYMMDDnn, where 'nn' is the revision. This number must be incremented every time you make a DNS change.

Refresh value 0/1

WARNING SOA Retry interval is : 60 seconds. This seems too small. (Values about 3600-7200 seconds is good if not using DNS NOTIFY; RFC1912 2.2 recommends a value between 1200 to 43200 seconds (20 minutes to 12 hours)). This value determines how often secondary/slave nameservers check with the master for updates.

Retry value 0/1

WARNING SOA Retry interval is : 30 seconds. This seems too small. (Values about 120-7200 seconds is good). The retry value is the amount of time your secondary/slave nameservers will wait to contact the master nameserver again if the last attempt failed.

Expire value 1/1

SUCCESS SOA Expire time is : 604800 seconds. This seems OK. (Values 604800 to 2419200 seconds (1-4 weeks) is good). RFC1912 suggests 2-4 weeks. This is how long a secondary/slave nameserver will wait before considering its DNS data stale if it can't reach the primary nameserver.

TTL value 0/1

WARNING SOA Expire time is : 30 seconds. This seems too small. (about 300 to 86400 seconds or 5 min - 24 hours is good). RFC2308 suggests a value of 1-3 hours. This value used to determine the default (technically, minimum) TTL (time-to-live) for DNS entries, but now is used for negative caching.